We are repeatedly told that compromise is necessary to “protect the profession.” But compromise without philosophical boundaries is surrender disguised as strategy. When chiropractic organizations blur definitions, soften language, or strategically avoid mentioning vertebral subluxation to gain temporary political favor, they are not being pragmatic, they are being irresponsible.

A profession that cannot articulate what it is cannot defend why it exists.

True unity is not achieved by minimizing differences. It is achieved by rallying around shared principles that are clearly defined and courageously defended. Chiropractic does not need less clarity to survive, it needs more.

IFCO’s Role: Governance Anchored in Philosophy

The IFCO was founded on a simple but increasingly rare conviction: chiropractic must be governed by chiropractic principles, not external medical frameworks. This does not mean rejecting science. It means rejecting scientism the ideological misuse of science to erase professional identity.

As president of the IFCO, my responsibility is not to make chiropractic politically palatable to others, but philosophically coherent to itself.

This is why IFCO works in concert with the International Academy of Chiropractic Education (IACE) to protect chiropractic’s academic foundations from ideological dilution and why we stand alongside the Chiropractic Freedom Coalition in defending vertebral subluxation from legal and regulatory erasure.

A Call to Action

If you believe chiropractic deserves governance grounded in reason rather than reputation management:

• Join the IFCO to strengthen principled political advocacy.

• Support the IACE to ensure chiropractic education remains philosophically honest.

• Stand with the Chiropractic Freedom Coalition to defend vertebral subluxation where it is most vulnerable: in law and regulation.

Politics without principle is noise. Chiropractic deserves better.

Go to IFCO